I don't understand wymyn

In fact, I'd even go so far as to say I can't stand to be in the presence of those who have embraced "wymynhood". To be quite fair, it's safe to say those people probably loathe who I am with perhaps even greater vehemence, I am after all not only a man, but derive my living off of pornography. Honestly, I care not a whit about their opinions or their enmity.

Now that I have indelibly engraved in stone that I am a misogynist to a certain rabid and irrational segment of the population, assuming I had somehow escaped such a judgment long ago, let's continue. The wymyn can go back to their gyno-centric mental masturbatory fantasies or get a solid start on some Lanius effigies to vent their displeasure upon later.

They would like to say their aim is simply to empower their gender and overcome sex-based inequality. Unfortunately, these are folks who have a wild hair so firmly lodged up their colons that they simply could not abide the spelling of "woman" and had to "cleanse" it of male roots. This is not behavior that reassures me of their well-considered arguments and measured response.

The spelling shift is not an act of equality; it's an act of division. The aberrant spelling rather than reinforcing the concept of being equal to any other gender instead demands that attention be paid to whether someone carries their gonads on the inside or the outside. It guarantees that any issue that utilizes such a spelling is also a gender issue.

Not only that, but also assigns increased importance to segments of words. If the inclusion of "man" in various terminologies is going to be seen as tainting the language with some nefarious gender bias, we're in deep trouble. "Man" is about as generic a term as is bloody possible. Not only designating a mature male, it can also refer to our species, or even as a mild exclamation/pseudo-profanity. Sure, "woman" includes that infamous chain of three letters but that doesn't mean there is anything remotely derogatory in the etymology. The jump to offense seems to draw close parallels to objecting to the word "grape" because it's based off the word "rape." In the case of man-woman, yes there is going to be a commonality to the terms used for the simple reason that there is a relationship between the concepts. I could say the same comparing either/both words with "human."

Even setting the issues above, the use of the bastardized term is predicated on the theory of "separate but equal" and anyone who studied history knows exactly how well that study proved to support that hypothesis. Which alludes to the conclusion that they are working toward an equally biased system only with themselves in the driver's seat.

Any social movement that incorporates the punishment, forced conversion, shaming and/or elimination of another part of their social fabric is immediately suspect. Wymyn or KKK, their rationality is the same.